![]() They often speak out about injustice from a relatively weak position of power, with the aim of changing the status quo. What makes an external whistleblower effective? Whistleblowers represent an important conduit for dissensus, providing valuable information about ethical breaches and organizational wrongdoing. This suggests that CMS researchers may find themselves inadvertently aiding and abetting the rise of managerialism in the university sector, which raises troubling questions about the future of critical scholarship in the business school. As a result, decisions about what to research and where to publish are increasingly being made according to the diktats of research assessments, journal rankings and managing editors of premier outlets. Drawing on extensive interviews with CMS professors, we show how the regime of excellence is eroding the ethos of critical scholars. The present paper contributes to the debate by exploring the relationship between the regime of excellence and critical management studies (CMS). Critical scholars have responded to the encroaching ideology of excellence in various ways: while some seek to defend such measures of academic performance on the grounds that they provide accountability and transparency in place of elitism and privilege, others have criticized their impact on scholarship. The regime of excellence – manifested in journal rankings and research assessments – is coming to increasing prominence in the contemporary university. For this Special Issue on governing work though self-management, the paper contributes by providing an empirical study of how consensus decision-making is enacted in a contemporary self-managing community. Furthermore, in speaking out against the higher-status long-term residents, a newcomer re-enacts the scenario of monarchic parrhesia and some forms of philosophical parrhesia. These include political parrhesia as enacted in the formal Assembly of the Athenian democracies and informally in the meeting places of the agora and philosophical parrhesia as enacted in the Epicurean communities through self-writing. ![]() A combination of the different forms of ancient parrhesia are found to be re-enacted in a contemporary setting. #Ispeech critique how toA reading of Foucault's later work on parrhesia in classical Antiquity is made, following on from which the paper analyses the contributions put forward by individual community members in reaching agreement on how to farm organically through practices reminiscent of parrhesia. Through ethnography, this paper applies the conceptual themes of parrhesia to the contemporary setting of a self-managing organic farming community. Networked parhessia provides a new infrastructure to enable a ‘parhessia of the governed.’ This paper demonstrates how WikiLeaks is of singular importance as a case study of organizational resistance in the way it moves beyond micropolitical acts of resistance, such as whistleblowing, towards an engagement with wider political struggles. It shows WikiLeaks’ profound challenge to hegemonic games of truth in terms of a ‘networked parhessia’, which entails a radical transformation of the process of truth telling in support of whistleblowers and in pursuit of an explicitly emancipatory, anarchist political agenda. The paper demonstrates the existence of different truth games at work in the WikiLeaks case. The paper shows how different ‘truth games’ are mobilised by different organizational actors engaged in a politics of truth. For an empirical illustration of a ‘truth game’ this paper draws on varied accounts of the WikiLeaks whistleblowing website. This paper investigates the role of ‘truth’ as an object of contention within organizations, with specific reference to the ‘politics of truth’ in the WikiLeaks case. #Ispeech critique freeTo me, it is in the everyday and embodied act of fearless rather than free speech that a certain kind of politics could be resuscitated from the incapacitating structures of Athenian democracy. In times where the very reality of a 'public space' seems to have been usurped by the interests of various elites, notably those associated with capital, I suggest that critique and social change might be better served by the actions of fearless speech, that is, courage to speak to power in the face of personal danger and out of a strong sense of moral duty. It argues that progressive notions of free speech as the basis for critique are conventionally and restrictively modelled on Athenian public spaces in which speech is neither free nor dialogue an a priori social good. ![]() ![]() It is written out of a strong personal belief that the inadequacy of the former mode of speech might well be superseded by the latter as a vehicle for critique. This paper addresses the relationship between speech and critique by juxtaposing the ideas of free speech and fearless speech. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |